![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjwT0aWBCcxpYJfX934RoRq3lhLVkot6lWRLqj8IunCugAqOmBF80zUHnpU5djo69TujZVghpiFZcD1WhQbQHaAhGRbwlEuJaE1XCxPaM1Qhm_tiofc0e7EhZlHf804tm3zZWkfXYow2SUK/s1600/bear+1.jpg)
For my example shots, I used my Samsung Galaxy S3 to take the images, a desk lamp to light the shots, and a teddy bear as the subject.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh5n5Ohb5ff4pUBynC7Gwjt9Qlwk__BNchm0LU2Ibobp9-IydgVp3PnSzfHEjYwOLMLIcmZfKp4aGgJ4LsKcVv5ILP64NNWCYT0KxzkTmGyuEW9aMhEDAsgHU5jaxUGj5MlLmkeuSWNKRSh/s1600/bear+2.jpg)
Image #2 (left) is an eye-level angle. This view makes the subject more approachable and should allow the viewer to more easily connect with the subject since both eyes are visible.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEheIlb01jrixBRxK42lAgm9mTmRUa5uqrvr7PPHbAAvf7JsM2VzQ1-el1aitYtXFGUKjDlhIUzBqTP7b7ShRfC0DXeP1EoMXDPvDiuF8p248Nmqqzo4ytAvTo6jdaBT4t_RPPW7WIpxBIZQ/s1600/bear+3.jpg)
An eye-level shot is what I usually strive for. Since we are typically striving for appeal and approachability it provides the most consistent emotional reaction in people.
That isn't to say that high-angle and low-angle shots should never be used. If the dramatic diminishing or enlarging effect fits the usage of the image, use a high or low angle shot.
And when I posted these photos on my Facebook page some commenters liked my low-angle shot because it revealed the smile of the bear and seemed to have a nicer backdrop. One person also liked it because it provided a more unique view of the bear.
The most consistent response, however, was in favor of the eye-level shot.
The same rules apply generally to angles of food and other products. Look at the cooking shows, magazines, and cookbooks' usage of angles. The images of food are typically at eye-level (or in that case I suppose you could think of it as nose level ;) ).